ExpatPro Blog
PATHWAYS TO LEGAL IMMIGRATION TO UKRAINE
Ukraine is facing a shortage of labour already. During the post-war recovery, this shortage will become even more acute. However, our bureaucracy is not ready and is not preparing to attract workforce from other countries, even though this is the fastest way to solve the increasing challenges of the labour market.
Foreigners who arrive in Ukraine for more than a short-term visit can be divided into two categories: those who stay in Ukraine temporarily and those who immigrate to Ukraine. The first category is documented by temporary residence permits, while the second category is documented by permanent residence permits. According to Ukrainian legislation, it is the second category of foreigners who are immigrants granted an indefinite permit to immigrate to Ukraine before obtaining a residence permit.
Legal Grounds for Obtaining an Immigration Permit to Ukraine
One cannot immediately move to Ukraine for permanent residence, a foreigner must initially meet one of the following criteria:
– to be married to a Ukrainian citizen for more than two years or to be married to a person who already has an immigration permit;
– Ukrainian citizenship of the immigrant’s child;
– Ukrainian ancestry (when a foreigner, their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents or their siblings, son or daughter, grandson or granddaughter were born or permanently resided in Ukraine before 24 August 1991);
– individuals whose immigration is of national interest to Ukraine, including scientists and cultural figures;
– foreign Ukrainians who have the appropriate documentation;
– investors who have invested more than USD 100,000 in the authorised capital of a Ukrainian company;
– persons who have served in the Ukrainian army for more than three years;
– highly skilled professionals and workers, whose urgent need is tangible for the Ukrainian economy, and their families (e.g. IT specialists);
– former citizens of Ukraine.
In order to obtain an immigration permit, a foreigner must confirm their place of residence in Ukraine, the legitimacy of their stay in Ukraine and provide evidence that they do not suffer from a number of infectious diseases, alcoholism or drug addiction. In addition, a foreigner immigrating to Ukraine must not have a criminal record for an offence which resulted in imprisonment for more than one year. Consideration of the foreigner’s documents and decision-making on their immigration to Ukraine is carried out under the latest amendments to the legislation within six months.
After obtaining an immigration permit, a foreigner is documented with a permanent residence permit in Ukraine, which is required to be renewed every ten years.
Immigration Quota for Ukraine
The number of foreigners who are allowed to immigrate to Ukraine is not unlimited, as the State Migration Service may limit it by setting quotas for each category of immigrants.
Some immigrants are not subject to the quota limits. For example, those who obtain permanent residence due to having a child who is a citizen of Ukraine, as well as marriage to a citizen of Ukraine, or due to Ukrainian ancestry.
However, the Cabinet of Ministers may set a quota for other categories of immigrants upon the proposal of the State Migration Service in the event of a massive arrival of immigrants to Ukraine. However, the new version of the Law of Ukraine “On Immigration” defines the mass arrival of migrants as a situation when the share of immigrants will exceed 10% of the total population of Ukraine.
Labour Migration: Can It Be Rampant?
When it comes to foreigners, who come to Ukraine for employment purposes, they cannot count on obtaining an immigration permit and the right to permanent residence in Ukraine. Only recently, the legislation allowed such individuals to apply for an immigration permit after five years of legal residence in Ukraine.
Labour migrants receive temporary residence permits pursuant to a work permit in Ukraine, which must be issued for them by their future employer. In other words, under the current legislation, a foreigner must arrive in Ukraine with the intention of working in a designated position for a predetermined employer.
A work permit in Ukraine is issued for a period of up to two years, subject to the foreigner’s recruitment for a specified job and payment of at least the minimum wage and relevant taxes. The employer pays a substantial state fee to obtain such a permit. This year, the fee is over UAH 21,000 for a two-year work permit for a foreigner.
The State Employment Service monitors compliance with the terms and conditions of employment of foreigners and inspects whether they are being paid wages and relevant taxes are being withheld. Such control disciplines employers, and if they violate the requirements, they may be restricted in their right to issue work permits for foreigners for a period of one year.
The employment of foreigners in Ukraine without a work permit does not give them the right to reside in Ukraine and obtain a residence permit and is a manifestation of irregular migration.
Obviously, the current mechanism for attracting foreign workforce to Ukraine does not facilitate the mass migration of labour migrants to our country, as it is not easy and requires a range of conditions. Indeed, a foreigner must find a job or be invited to work in Ukraine while staying abroad. In other words, a potential legal labour migrant, as a rule, does not come to Ukraine to look for a job, but must already have a job offer when obtaining a visa to Ukraine and crossing the state border.
This procedure leads to the fact that a large number of labour migrants currently work in Ukraine without a work permit and, accordingly, without a residence permit, which does not contribute to the protection of the rights of both foreigners and Ukrainian citizens.
In my opinion, given Ukraine’s stated need for labour migrants, the approach to granting permission for foreigners to work in Ukraine will soon need to be reconsidered. It would be advisable to grant qualified foreigners the right to work in Ukraine in a certain field with the subsequent independent search for an employer here. This model is used in EU countries and will help Ukrainian employers meet their labour needs expeditiously.
After Five Years of Employment, One Can Immigrate to Ukraine
Recent amendments to the Law “On Immigration” have provided for the possibility of obtaining an immigration permit by a foreigner who has been continuously residing in Ukraine for five years against a temporary residence permit. This rule applies, in particular, to migrant workers.
In order to obtain the right to permanent residence in Ukraine, a labour migrant will need to prove that they have resided in Ukraine legally on the basis of a residence permit, have not left Ukraine for more than 180 days in total in a year and have not left Ukraine for more than 90 days in one trip.
In my view, this new provision of the law is very relevant and will encourage legal and regulated labour migration to Ukraine. Indeed, the prospect of obtaining permanent residence in Ukraine in five years will motivate foreigners to come to Ukraine legally and to draw up all documents as required by the current legislation.
Who is Eligible for Ukrainian Citizenship
Ukrainian legislation provides for the right of foreigners to apply for citizenship, provided they have obtained a permit to immigrate to Ukraine and have resided in Ukraine for five years. The latter requirement does not apply to foreigners who have been married to a Ukrainian citizen for more than two years.
In addition to meeting the above criteria, such foreigners must pass an exam on the fundamentals of the Constitution of Ukraine, the history of Ukraine, and an exam on the level of proficiency in the Ukrainian language.
Acquisition of citizenship is not a speedy process, and the final decision on it is made by the President of Ukraine upon the proposal of the Citizenship Commission.
It is worth noting that over the past five years, the President has not issued any decrees on granting Ukrainian citizenship (except for decrees on persons considered to be of national interest to Ukraine). As a result, it created a long queue of people who have applied for Ukrainian citizenship in recent years and are still waiting for a decision.
I believe that this issue will be resolved as soon as possible, as transparent and fast immigration and citizenship procedures will attract highly qualified personnel to Ukraine, whose efforts will definitely be appreciated during the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine.
Originally published on 08 September 2023 here:
https://zn.ua/ukr/POLITICS/jak-zakonno-immihruvati-v-ukrajinu.html
The War Proved That Ukrainian Small Business Is Highly Resilient and Promising
In the interview with Tetiana Yashchenko and Vasyl Cherednichenko, partners in EXPATRO, we talk about the practice of migration law and IT, changes in the partner structure and how their company works during the war.
– Vasyl, could you please tell us how EXPATRO’s work has changed since the start of the full-scale war?
– Undoubtedly, our work has changed drastically, in terms of clients and employees. The start of the full-scale invasion was a dreadful shock for everyone. We suspended operations for a few days. Later, as soon as we realised that people were safe, we returned to work. We notified the team that we were continuing to work on the projects we had started before, and were ready to undertake new ones.
First and foremost, we focused on supporting our employees and the team as a whole. This was a priority for us, both in terms of organisational and financial support.
Given that a certain number of our clients are foreigners, many of whom have left the territory of Ukraine and some have suspended their projects, our work with them has changed. Over time, Tetiana and I decided that we needed to reopen the office in Kyiv, so in May, EXPATPRO resumed its work in the same way as before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the russian federation.
– What changes occurred in the company’s structure during this time?
– It is worth noting that we have had changes in the company’s partner structure, as Liubomyr Kuziutkin decided to leave the company. He is now focused mainly on his private projects. This decision is primarily due to family circumstances. We will continue to cooperate with him on his new projects. Accordingly, the company now has two partners: me and Tetiana. Tetiana heads the corporate law, IT, and accounting practices, while I am responsible for private clients, migration law, and real estate.
– Tetiana, what steps has the company taken to adapt to the new conditions?
– First of all, the essential thing was to keep in touch with our employees and make sure they were safe. We started to schedule online meetings more frequently. Before the full-scale invasion, in some cases, we departed from the tradition of regular team calls and started working in the office. After the outbreak of a large-scale war, we had to restore this tradition again so that our employees were aware that we were there, we had work to do, no one had disappeared, and they had a place to return to. We had been working online for a long time, so no major organisational changes took place, and we had all the accesses set up. The only thing we needed to do was to establish a more consistent internet connection and communication. During the first few weeks of the war, everyone was mostly busy providing their families with a safe place to stay, so the work was mainly focused on partners and senior associates who were involved with clients. However, our work in business and accounting support did not stop even on 24 February.
– Vasyl, what is the current state of affairs with the practice of migration law? Has the number of inquiries changed? Which issues do clients most often address to you?
– Previously, the focus of our work was on foreigners who came to Ukraine, and we were engaged in processing their documents and supporting their projects. Now the trend is that fewer foreigners are coming to Ukraine, in particular from the category we used to work with: entrepreneurs or people who have family ties to Ukraine or work here. This flow of foreigners has decreased and suspended slightly, but after the war, we expect a multiple increase and resumption. However, we are now being approached by foreigners who are somehow connected with the military, volunteering, and people involved in the work of international and charitable organisations. We are currently dealing with the migration of such persons.
Many questions have arisen regarding belarusian and russian citizens. Currently, most of our work is with belarusian clients who came to Ukraine in 2020, fleeing the authoritarian regime. Their legal status in Ukraine is not simple. We also receive inquiries about legal issues related to the relocation of Ukrainians abroad, and the paperwork there and in Ukraine.
– Have many foreign companies left Ukraine since the start of the full-scale war? What industries did they represent?
– The trend shows that people are indeed leaving: from small businesses to large companies. However, as we can observe, the business remains in Ukraine as an organisation. Foreigners are not rushing to close their companies in Ukraine and stop doing business. In particular, part of our work is to provide services to those businesses and structures that have remained, even though their employees have temporarily moved abroad. As far as we understand, foreign businesses have no intention of leaving Ukraine. This is just a pause, and after the victory, all employees will definitely return to Ukraine.
– Do you see any interest from foreign businesses that might want to enter Ukraine?
– Vasyl: We have already had inquiries from new foreign clients who are interested in the Ukrainian market. There are inquiries from people doing business related to restoration and construction, damage assessment, production of dual-use goods, demining, etc. We receive such requests, and we understand that they are now ready to start their business in Ukraine.
Tetiana: I would like to add a few words here. IT companies have remained, and we are observing an increase in the number of employees. Their expectations include the possibility of a proper booking procedure for employees, and they continue to increase their workforce in Ukraine, so this industry has not suffered. In addition, the number of requests from charitable international organisations is increasing, and many innovative and technically interesting engineering projects are finally able to find funding in Ukraine, as there are many donor programmes for innovative engineering solutions.
– How is the IT sector performing in general? Will companies return to Ukraine, or are there any risks that the world might lure away IT specialists from here because it would be more profitable for them to work abroad?
– Tetiana: Indeed, there are such concerns, especially involving specialists from belarus, whom Ukraine welcomed earlier. Also in 2020, special programmes for IT specialists were introduced, which were successfully implemented in 2021. Most of the specialists did leave. The risk for business is that it is difficult to obtain permits for such employees, it is impossible to pay their salaries, their accounts are blocked, and legislative procedures are not quite clear, so most decide to move from Ukraine to Poland. Thus, there will also be an outflow. Many companies with capital, where belarusians are part of the ownership structure, also temporarily stop working in Ukraine or leave our market completely. They do not understand how to prove that they do not pose a threat to national security, that they are actually working in Ukraine intending to continue to operate successfully in the future.
Speaking of our clients, none of them made a decision to leave the Ukrainian market completely. Most of them suspend work or minimise their expenses, transfer their staff to another company, but do not close their offices. Once the situation stabilises for them (the business), they will immediately be ready to return. The same applies to other foreigners (individual entrepreneurs) who are ready to return to Ukraine because they used to feel comfortable working in our country. In fact, for many specialists, Lviv is now the new IT capital (laughs – Ed. note).
– Does Diia.City meet expectations?
– Tetiana: The idea is brilliant, but the implementation is a bit tricky. I am sure that very little tax will be paid. Not many of our clients have switched to Diia.City, because they are used to working with a stable mechanism. Given that the tax authorities and auditors assessing their activities have little experience here, it is still difficult to make such radically risky financial decisions, and there have been very few of them doing so. In addition, we should not forget about currency risks. I don’t think it would be right to judge Diia.City’s performance by the results of the military year of 2022. We need everything to work in a normal mode, which is not the case now. I hope that Diia.City will be fully functional in the future, but the statistics of the transition will be somewhat distorted due to the war.
– Ukraine has introduced e-residency. How will it support our economy?
– Tatiana: It is an attractive initiative. Firstly, if we look at the numbers alone, the number of contractors should increase. What is clear: there are more entrepreneurs, more foreigners who choose the preferential taxation regime in Ukraine, and they find it convenient. Given that such a decision does not change the general tax status of an individual automatically, I do not think that many foreigners will risk separately reporting in their own country the income they have legally received in another country, paid taxes in another country and will not worry that the tax authorities will want to tax such income or change their status to another. Therefore, there is more work for the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine to do here, namely to provide official clarifications and international cooperation to resolve issues in the context of double taxation. Unfortunately, no one can guarantee this. Secondly, we do not yet know how this e-residency will work, as the online system has not been developed and no requests can be submitted yet. Therefore, time will tell.
– Tetiana, what is the current state of corporate law practice? What kind of requests did you receive in 2022? What prospects do you see for the practice in 2023?
– We ended 2021 under the slogan of reporting on ownership structures. We were sure that we would breathe a sigh of relief in 2022, but it didn’t happen. In 2022 we were unable to resolve the issue of tax residency, whether it is possible to keep a citizen of the republic of belarus as a minority shareholder, if they, for example, permanently reside in Germany. Therefore, we received many requests to change the ownership structure. Opening offices in Ukraine in 2022 seemed to be less popular, but international organisations and charities, that provide assistance to Ukraine, were more active.
Other requests included the temporary suspension of companies’ operations, minimising costs, and changing the management team, as it is not an easy task to dismiss a top manager. It is necessary to draw up the documents correctly and minimise the risks of compensation.
I would like to highlight requests for work with banks. Approving documents with banks now means additional hassle. For foreign businesses, the situation is not entirely clear. In the first months of the war, everyone was sympathetic to such force majeure. Now things are somewhat different: some people are starting to forget that Ukraine is in a full-scale war and life goes on according to different rules.
– Apart from IT and corporate law, what other practices are also in demand? Describe the general state of business in Ukraine in 2022 – early 2023.
– Tetiana: Ukrainians surprised themselves in 2022: many companies stayed in Ukraine, adapting to new tasks and challenges. Smaller companies adapted more easily, as they were more flexible and managed to change their work organisation slightly, and by the end of 2022, they had already started making plans for two or three months in a row. Our company does the same.
Currently, businesses need support with contracts, and many issues arise with permits. The government is basically trying to simplify certain regulations by introducing preferential terms and temporary permits. Most companies want to return to work according to the rules, schedule, without delays or excuses. In 2023, we expect a lot of requests from accounting departments regarding timely reporting. Double taxation issues were popular among requests, and this trend will continue this year.
The country’s economy will be saved by intellectuals who are flexible enough to work from anywhere in the world. And then we will work together in synergy to overcome the difficult times.
– Do you see any prospects for investment development of the economy as a whole after the country’s reconstruction?
– Vasyl: Currently, companies are interested in issues related to life under martial law. We are also being approached by foreigners for advice on the business climate of the Ukrainian legal system in the future. Ukraine is a kind of magnet now and the centre of attention around the world. It is a large country with a large population and powerful resources, so it is obvious that there will be many more opportunities after the Victory. In addition, investments will flow to Ukraine; we expect the return of investors who have suspended their projects but are already planning to come back. The war has shown that Ukrainian small business is very resilient and promising. Entrepreneurs are ready to adapt to any difficulties. Who else but small businesses should create a new strong economy now? We no longer need to rely on one thousand giant companies that pay the lion’s share of taxes and shape the country’s economy. We need to support small businesses, which have shown that they are the ones that make the country’s life viable. Fair and transparent rules for doing business should be introduced for both Ukrainians and foreigners. When it comes to migration law, unfortunately, investments have declined today, and all that remains are old approaches to work that are not transparent. It would be helpful if the migration service treated foreign investors better.
– What are EXPATPRO’s plans for 2023?
– Vasyl: To continue our work and stay in our current position. There is a great desire to preserve the team. We really appreciate our employees and dream of working towards increasing the number of projects. And the most important thing is the VICTORY.
Tetiana: We have been striving for many years to become professional specialists in migration law and have won our place in the IT industry. Therefore, we need to maintain these positions. We have a great team of experts, and we have the potential for further growth. In addition, we have unique skills in working with foreigners, so they will need our help in the future.
Originally published on 25 January 2023 here:
Reasons for Deprivation of Ukrainian Citizenship
The so-called deprivation of Ukrainian citizenship of persons holding dual citizenship has recently become a burning and frequently discussed issue in the press
This issue has received significant publicity and wide media coverage following the President’s decisions regarding political figures, including MP Andrii Artemenko and Odesa Regional Council member Oleksandr Borovyk.
However, for the sake of fairness, it should be noted that the president’s decision to terminate Ukrainian citizenship is not an exceptional or unique phenomenon: Petro Poroshenko has terminated the citizenship of Ukraine for 18.67 thousand people during his tenure.
What is the legal framework for the legal status of individuals, including citizenship?
To answer this question, we should start with an analysis of the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine.
According to Article 4 of the Constitution of Ukraine, Ukraine has a legal principle of single citizenship, the procedure for acquisition and termination of which is determined by law. Furthermore, Article 25 of the Constitution of Ukraine provides that a citizen of Ukraine cannot be deprived of Ukrainian citizenship, nor of the right to change citizenship.
In line with the same principle, dual (and more) citizenship is not actually prohibited in Ukraine. The Law of Ukraine “On Citizenship of Ukraine” (the “Law”) provides that if a citizen of Ukraine has acquired citizenship (nationality) of another state or states, then in legal relations with Ukraine they are recognised as a citizen of Ukraine exclusively.
Then why are Ukrainian citizens deprived of their citizenship? According to Section 3 of the Law, Ukrainian citizenship may be terminated. The grounds for this may include: renunciation of citizenship, loss of citizenship and grounds provided for by international agreements. In all these cases, Ukrainian citizenship is terminated by a presidential decree.
With renunciation of citizenship, we are clear: citizenship is terminated as a result of an application by a citizen of Ukraine permanently residing abroad. Rare cases provided for in international agreements have also not been the basis for high-profile cases of termination of citizenship, whereas the procedure for loss of citizenship deserves special attention, and it was applied, in particular, to Borovyk and Artemenko.
The grounds for the loss of Ukrainian citizenship are as follows:
1) voluntary acquisition of citizenship of another country by an adult citizen of Ukraine;
2) acquisition of Ukrainian citizenship by a foreigner (or stateless person) as a result of fraud, submission of false information or false documents. This clause also applies to foreigners who have obtained Ukrainian citizenship and have not terminated their foreign citizenship within 2 years;
3) voluntary enlistment of a citizen of Ukraine for military service in a country where, according to the law, such service is not considered military duty or alternative (non-military) service.
This implies that if a Ukrainian citizen has the citizenship of another country, it is perfectly legal to decide to renounce Ukrainian citizenship. It is worth noting that these provisions of Ukrainian law are ambiguous, as the procedure is not described in a transparent manner, and there is no obligation for a Ukrainian citizen to renounce Ukrainian citizenship in case of obtaining a passport of another country.
At the same time, the boundaries between deprivation of citizenship (prohibited by the Constitution of Ukraine) and its loss are blurred. The law, interpreting the principle of single citizenship, stipulates that if a citizen of Ukraine obtains citizenship (nationality) of another state, they are considered to be a citizen of Ukraine in legal relations with Ukraine.
A presidential decree of 27 March 2001 entitled “Issues of organising the implementation of the Law of Ukraine on Citizenship of Ukraine” clarified the procedure for losing citizenship. This subordinate legislation states that in cases where the State Migration Service or diplomatic missions of Ukraine determine that there are grounds for the loss of Ukrainian citizenship of a certain person, they shall notify the Commission on Citizenship under the President of Ukraine, which is authorised to make decisions.
However, and unfortunately, the details of these procedures are also not clearly defined, and it is not provided in detail in which way, on what grounds and by whom the fact of the presence/absence of a second citizenship is initially determined and verified. The failure to establish a detailed procedure may significantly violate the rights of citizens, including the right to privacy and protection of personal data.
Thus, in accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine, the State Migration Service and the Presidential Commission on Citizenship must act in accordance with a certain procedure: for instance, to send a request only in cases clearly defined in the legislation, within certain time limits, etc. Yet, as previously noted, we will not find any such details of the procedure in Ukrainian legislation, which could be used by Andrii Artemenko and his defence lawyers to appeal against the decision to terminate his citizenship.
Despite such obvious drawbacks in the Ukrainian legislation on the issue of termination of Ukrainian citizenship, the law clearly provides for the possibility of the President of Ukraine to decide on the loss (termination) of Ukrainian citizenship upon receipt of any official confirmation of dual citizenship.
Thus, Ukrainian citizens who hold citizenship of another country risk being included in the list of persons whose citizenship has been terminated, although this risk is still extremely low, as the procedure is quite complicated and the decision is subject to appeal.
Originally published on 19 May 2017 here: https://biz.nv.ua/ukr/experts/za-shcho-mozhut-pozbaviti-gromadjanstva-ukrajini-1168086.html
Zelenskyy Backs the Return of the Pre-War Tax Regime
Andriy Galytskyi:
Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed Draft Law No. 8401 and returned the business tax rules that were in force in Ukraine before the full-scale war with Russia.
On 26 July, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed a draft law abolishing the 2% single tax and partially lifting the moratorium on business inspections. This was reported by Danylo Hetmantsev, Chairman of the Committee on Finance, Tax and Customs Policy, on his Telegram channel.
“Draft law 8401 has become law. Use it,” he posted.
What changes for businesses are expected and when?
Under the law, which was adopted by the Parliament at the end of May, Ukraine will abolish the following starting from 1 August:
- the special single tax regime with a rate of 2% of income;
- the right to exempt individual entrepreneurs of the first and second groups from paying the single tax (except for the frontline areas).
Furthermore, the draft law No. 8401 provides for:
- partial resumption of documental inspections: for excisable goods (alcohol, tobacco, fuel), gambling and financial services;
- reinstatement of fines for violations of tax legislation and the procedure for using cash registers (Payment Transaction Registers (RRO)/Payment Registrar Software PRRO) from 1 October. However, a reduced amount of fines will apply (25% and 50% of the value of the goods instead of 100% and 150%, respectively) if the business does not use Payment Transaction Registers (until the end of martial law, but no later than 1 August 2025).
The new taxes for business
Tetiana Yashchenko, partner at EXPATPRO, explained to Focus that a taxpayer who opted for the 2% tax rate from the date of state registration (“newly established entity”) will automatically be transferred to the 3rd group of the simplified taxation system at the 5% rate from 1 August.
“Therefore, if you need to be on a different system (or at a different rate) from 1 August 2023, you need to apply for the respective transition,” she pointed out.
Natalia Buta, Chief Accountant at GLS Law Firm, highlighted that those taxpayers who shifted from the 2% single tax to the general system in 2023 will be allowed to re-switch to the simplified taxation system of their choice within a year, already in 2023, or after submitting an application.
“In the event that an application is submitted before 1 September 2023, such a taxpayer will be considered a single tax payer from 1 August 2023,” Buta stated.
To remind, on 28 June, Volodymyr Zelenskyy declared that he was not against cutting taxes, but now these plans are being hampered by the war with Russia.
Originally published on 26 July 2023 here:
CHANGES FOR THE IMPORTERS. WHAT SHOULD WE BE PREPARED FOR?
The balance of foreign trade depends on the decisions of the government and the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU)
Law No. 7418 “On Amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Revision of Certain Tax Benefits”, recently signed by the President, primarily provides for the cancellation of zero customs clearance for cars, however, it is not limited to this. So what else has changed in customs policy?
Changes Overview
In addition to the cancellation of preferential customs clearance of cars, the Law establishes restrictions on the alienation of imported vehicles: not earlier than 1095 days from the date of their state registration in Ukraine. The Law introduces the requirement for vehicles to meet environmental standards and stipulates that no exemptions will apply to vehicles originating in the Russian Federation or the Republic of Belarus.
However, the major changes are different.
Firstly, the law reintroduces VAT and duties on imported goods, which were lifted at the beginning of the war.
The Law provides, among other things, for additional grounds for the lifting or application of customs quotas and privileges, and the cancellation of duties on certain groups of goods in response to friendly actions by countries in free trade agreements with Ukraine. In other words, it means the possibility of applying certain exemptions to goods produced in the countries that are currently helping Ukraine.
Secondly, to sweeten the pot, the Law of Ukraine “On Foreign Economic Activity”, which specifies the mechanism for implementing the principle of reciprocity in customs policy, is being amended accordingly: if a certain state introduces benefits for Ukrainian goods, Ukraine has the right (but not the obligation) to introduce customs benefits in return.
However, the law is far from being a complete solution; rather, it is aimed at creating conditions for the adoption of new bylaws to introduce (cancel) certain benefits or exemptions in the future in response to the assistance received by Ukraine.
This step is obvious and beneficial to importers and Ukrainians as a temporary measure, as it is difficult to guarantee and fully supply Ukraine with all the necessary goods in the current circumstances, as damage to infrastructure, businesses, and labour outflow usually affect production. Therefore, customs privileges should have an impact on the price of imported goods, which may be in short supply due to the war in Ukraine.
Currency restrictions and imports
However, it is worth noting that the list of critical imports approved by the government is still in force, and it is of paramount importance for Ukraine’s ability to purchase goods. At the same time, restrictions on cross-border money transfers imposed by the National Bank of Ukraine remain in effect. To date, the option of paying for goods and services for import into our country is determined by the category of “critical imports”. It is currently simply not possible to pay for other goods and services abroad, regardless of any exemptions or benefits. Banks examine the purpose of the payment thoroughly, requesting contracts and additional documentation to confirm the purpose of the transaction. Any additional inspections slow down the processes, so they obviously do not make life easier for entrepreneurs. Business representatives are currently interested in changes to currency regulation, simplified banking transactions and stability in the foreign exchange market.
The NBU reacted with restrained optimism, stating that this decision may soon become the basis for the abolition of the above currency restrictions.
“The entry into force of the law creates the preconditions for the NBU to lift restrictions on foreign currency purchases and cross-border transfers for the import of goods. At the same time, under martial law, we consider it appropriate to maintain restrictions on the purchase of foreign currency and cross-border transfers for the import of services,” the NBU stated. “The reintroduction of duties and taxes on the import of goods and services is an important step towards restoring the foreign exchange market’s ability to self-balance. In particular, this will support further recovery of production in Ukraine and will help limit the growth of imports, which puts pressure on the foreign exchange market and Ukraine’s international reserves.”
The list of such goods and services is also regularly updated and revised, now covering almost 90% of the list of all goods imported to Ukraine before the war. Therefore, if the NBU proceeds with the lifting of currency restrictions as promised, and Ukraine does indeed grant benefits to important groups of imported goods, the situation in foreign trade could change for the better rather quickly. If it takes too long to lift the currency restrictions, the real sector will continue to lose money and prices for imported goods will continue to rise.
Therefore, we are primarily expecting changes in the context of expanding (detailing) the list of goods and services classified as critical imports and amending the approach to current currency restrictions. Since the laws mainly provide for the grounds for applying concessionary mechanisms, their practical implementation rests with the entities that deal with such issues – the Cabinet of Ministers and the NBU – who can respond quickly to changes within the existing environment and the needs of the public.
Originally published on 07 July 2022 here:
https://zn.ua/ukr/business/zmini-dlja-importera-do-choho-hotuvatisja.html
Diia City During the Wartime
Tetiana Yashchenko, PhD, partner at Expatpro, analysed the legal regime of Diia City in the present-day reality
The legal regime of Diia City is an experiment to an extent. The rules that should be applied to Diia City residents are uncommon for the vast majority of businesses in Ukraine. Moreover, it would be quite helpful to see how well the requirement to apply the exit capital tax in Ukraine works, as it has been considered for many years to be an alternative to the corporate income tax in Ukraine. The experiment is being conducted under rather extreme conditions, which will undoubtedly affect the outcome.
Diia City 2022 in Figures
The Diia City data system was launched on 08 February 2022. The first residents were registered on 15 February. By the end of 2022, the number of registered businesses had already reached 428. This means that the absolute majority of registrations happened during the period of martial law in Ukraine.
Decisions on the acquisition and loss of the Diia City resident status are public and posted on the official website. No explanations on the decision (motivational part) are publicly disclosed.
Notably, the Desnianskyi District State Tax Inspectorate of the Head Office of the State Fiscal Service in Kyiv city was denied the residency status of Diia City.
Selection Criteria and Control
The Law of Ukraine “On Stimulating the Development of the Digital Economy in Ukraine” clearly defines the resident’s obligation to meet the criteria applicable to residents throughout the entire period. The only exception is non-compliance with the criteria (namely, the requirements for the average number of employees and gig workers, the amount of average monthly remuneration to employees and gig workers) for newly established business entities (registered less than 24 calendar months prior to applying for residency status with income not exceeding the income limit for Group 3 of the simplified taxation system). They have a conditional “grace” period to meet the following criteria: the calendar year in which the resident status was obtained and the following calendar year. The applicant must indicate that special conditions apply to them in the application for status (a start-up mark is required).
Residents are required to submit their first reports no later than 6 calendar months after the date of obtaining resident status. These are compliance reports or an audit report, depending on the grounds for obtaining resident status. In the event of discrepancies between the initial data and the information provided in the report, an independent opinion may be demanded.
Residents have to file an annual report (by 1 June) for the previous calendar year (annual compliance report), which must be accompanied by an independent auditor’s opinion.
Since the regime is new, the control over compliance with the rules and achievement of compliance criteria is rather lenient and essentially allows for a “margin for error”. Violation of the reporting deadlines is not an unconditional basis for a decision to lose the status, although repeated violations will result in a negative decision.
The operating conditions during martial law tend to provide for the possibility to refer to force majeure to justify the non-application of penalties or sanctions. It is essential, though, to confirm the impact of such conditions on the impossibility of timely (or full) fulfilment of obligations, similar to the position of the Ukrainian tax authorities. No specific notifications or decisions have been made on this issue.
Loss of Diia City Resident Status
The main reason for losing the resident status is non-compliance with the requirements. At the same time, the wording of the Law suggests that the administrative procedure creates opportunities for a resident to eliminate “minor discrepancies” (such as repayment of tax debt, bringing the ownership structure into compliance) without actually losing the status.
So far, there have been a few decisions on the loss of Diia City resident status. Although, based on the analysis of the decisions, such processes were initiated by the applicants themselves (decisions were made based on their applications). The Ministry of Digital Transformation has not yet issued any decisions on the loss of Diia City resident status due to non-compliance with the criteria.
No statistics on the performance of Diia City have been publicly released, and the first more or less complete annual reports with auditors’ opinions are due by 01 June 2023. They are likely to serve as performance indicators.
The war in Ukraine had an impact on the functioning of this regime, as some investors suspended their activities and postponed the launch of new projects in Ukraine. Therefore, 2022 can hardly be considered the “ideal” year for conducting such an experiment and for an objective assessment of its results.
To summarise, the IT industry has so far proved to be one of the most resilient in Ukraine during the war, and the data from the Register also confirms this. We are expecting the Ministry of Digital Transformation to consider the annual reports and the decisions that will be made based on the results of the annual reporting.


